Google Main Page 20 KB
Search for Cody Taylor 38 KB
Search for asdf asdf 10 KB
The search for Cody Taylor was so large because of images displayed at the top of the pages.
Bing Main Page 109 KB
Search for Cody Taylor 22 KB
Over 5 times the data of Google. The search for Cody Taylor on Bing didn’t show any pictures but was still twice the size of a normal Google seearch. If we take into account the New Ajax onMouseOver event on Bing for each search result it becomes 27 KB still without any images. Remember those articles that went off about how much energy every google query uses? Looks like Bing more than triples that amount.
Of course both these sites are much more effecient when we take into account that after the first visit most of the large data is already cached in our browser. For this test I was clearing all my cache between each transaction.
Bing does have quite a few redeeming features and for a first impression it looks like it may be a serious contender but it still lacks the simplicity and speed of google.
Source : http://codytaylor.org
Untuk mencari pic, menurut aku bing lebih baek tampilannya daripada Gugel..
BalasHapusI think bing should make some development to beat google. I meant.. Bing is still new, I pretty sure that in the next upcoming years Bing will be much better.
BalasHapus